RelayERP implementation operations

Public demoView-only · fictional data

Brightwater Provisions, Inc.

LedgerPro to new ERP

Cutover: 2026-06-30
Go-live: 2026-07-01
Books: USD

Overview
Work queue

Migration data

Setup
Imported data
Mappings

Checks & reconciliation

Verification runs
Accounting checks
Reconciliation
Issues
Duplicate parties

Changes & approvals

Approvals
Applied corrections

Go-live

Readiness
Audit log
Policy

Loading this view

Portfolio prototype · Fictional accounting data · No real company, ledger or person is represented here. This demo is one shared copy of a fictional implementation, so anything that would change it for the next visitor is left out. Everything else — the evidence, the reconciliation trail and the governed workflow behind each decision — is real and explorable.

Issues
BWP-43

BWP-43: Payment references an unknown customer

▲critical•open

Nature: migration defect
Category: Completeness
Raised by: Rule
Amount at risk: —
Rule or reconciliation: AR.PAYMENT_PARTY_EXISTS
Last seen: run

Subjects

Normalized record

pay:received:PMT-31877

Latest finding

Relay check result

PMT-31877 references C-0412, which is not in the party master

Expected: null
Observed: "C-0412"

Source rows Original source

row 1821, line 1822

Workflow

Ownership and progress. Issues become resolved only when a current run no longer reports them.

Owner: unassigned

View-only in public demo

Assigning an owner or moving an issue's status is ordinary operator work here.

View-only in public demo

A disposition records a decision about a real legacy misstatement — carry it forward, adjust it, or rule it out — as a change request two people approve.

Related issues

No linked issues.

Links are created when a disposition or decision covers more than one finding.

Comments

View-only in public demo

Commenting is how the implementation team works an issue between runs.

History

Every governed change to this issue, in order.

2026-09-22 05:11:47ZIssue created

Investigate with AI

The investigator reads this migration with read-only tools and cites its evidence. It cannot change anything.

In this public demo every visitor shares one copy, so a finding is investigated once and everyone sees that same result. The tools really run against this database — the evidence is genuine — and the reasoning is a scripted transcript, not a model.